Betting Tips For UFC On Fox 10 – Chico Camus v Yaotzin Meza

Chico Camus struggles badly against grapplers and has some of the worst take down defence in the UFC’s Bantamweight division. This weakness will leave him vulnerable against Yaotzin Meza, who is a world class grappler with excellent takedown skills.

Camus has significantly better striking than Meza, but any advantage is negated by the 5 inch reach advantage that Meza has over him. This reach advantage will make it easy for Meza to avoid Camus’ power punches, before closing the distance and taking him down.

Most people will bet on Chico Camus to win this fight, but the smart money is on Meza. This is another example of how popularity can influence MMA betting lines, as Camus is a big favourite in this fight, simply because he is the more popular fighter.

Meza is a tough, grinding wrestler, who’s style will overwhelm Camus and as a result this is his fight to lose. His grappling skills and reach advantage will just be too much for Camus to deal with. [adrotate group=”16″] are offering great odds on a Meza win, with the betting lines currently sitting at around 2.65 [+165 or 32/20]. These are great odds on a fighter with such a clear advantage, but they will definitely drop as we get closer to fight night. Place your bets as soon as possible, to maximize your profits and cash in on some easy money!

YAOTZIN MEZA TO WIN[divider]

BEST ODDS AVAILABLE FOR THIS UFC FIGHT…

The best odds for this fight can be found at [adrotate group=”16″].
 

Decimal
Fractional
American
Yaotzin Meza To Win
2.65
32/20
+165
Chico Camus To Win
1.5
1/2
-200

[adrotate group=”13″]

[divider]

MORE UFC BETTING TIPS FOR UFC ON FOX 10…

Benson Henderson v Josh Thomson

Gabriel Gonzaga v Stipe Miocic

Adriano Martins v Donald Cerrone

Alex Caceres v Sergio Pettis

Chico Camus v Yaotzin Meza

Daron Cruickshank v Mike Rio

 

I'm a Professional Gambler from the UK. I specialize in betting on MMA. I've got 1 kid, a Shih Tzu and I've been making money from gambling for around 8 years now.

Leave a Reply